A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall in a coastal web-site in the north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes attracted countrywide notice adhering to an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed relatives residence at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of setting up breaches, environmental issues, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Situations report about René Collier and the Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed into a hugely publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design works at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, search for to build their family members household. The situation has become emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being constructed by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted under planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those people of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their scheduling authorization by creating a wall past the boundaries of their web page, bringing about an encroachment on the Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, significantly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, the place views of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-higher h2o during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website turned Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair merely endeavoring to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon Experienced guidance and accredited options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty diverse Skilled backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-significant water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of midsection-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily truth of your coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling conditions. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to live together with one another extended after the lawful charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental defense and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.