A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family residence. The case is becoming emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of established inhabitants. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally citizens of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their arranging authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological implications, significantly within a delicate coastal atmosphere including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, which is partially constructed, is in the correct position. Their lawful workforce has characterised the action being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to maintain their perspective, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, the place sights of the sea are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts by the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-higher water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture which has due to the fact come to be emblematic in the intensity with the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they were meant to Get visual proof in the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Periods claimed, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm drinking water to photograph the site turned Probably the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these kinds of actions were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a place affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 grew to become extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to know the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders need to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute inside the legal timeline.
On the core with the dispute is a disagreement in excess of boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has been referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling files, maps, and situations hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally pressured that their action is enthusiastic by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal perspective, insisting alternatively that it's about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they may have explained their long-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few only endeavoring to build a spouse and children property in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches on the Specific Spot of Conservation and say that each one will work are actually completed according to Experienced advice and approved strategies. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including coming into The ocean all through a storm, usually do not change the underlying points.
The case has also raised broader questions on how arranging disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute around construction of wall at coastal site has grown to be a shorthand description for any circumstance a large number of observers see as significantly typical. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation involving personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is now extra contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier noted which the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are becoming synonymous With all the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 photographed the website from the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by means of midsection-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Bodily truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket must determine whether or not the wall as built complies with planning authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building performs at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the situation extend beyond that deal with. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the significance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and home legal rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized inquiries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or completed as prepared will rely upon the court’s conclusions. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely go on to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.